When it comes to the Botox vs Dysport debate, it can be difficult to compare the two injectables. Both Dysport and Botox are effective in reducing moderate to severe wrinkles and fine lines, but they have some key differences. Dysport is manufactured by the pharmaceutical company Galderma, while Botox is made by Allergan. Dysport has smaller protein molecules, which can reduce the formation of antibodies that eventually break down the formula and reduce its effectiveness.
Dysport is indicated for the temporary improvement of the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines associated with procerus and corrugator muscle activity in adult patients under 65 years of age. If you're used to a certain number of units with your Botox treatments, that number is likely to increase when you switch to Dysport. Initially, it was announced that Dysport would last longer, but studies have shown that both last around 3 to 4 months. When research subjects smiled, the sides treated with Dysport showed fewer wrinkles than the sides treated with Botox.
By treating fine lines that appear around the eyes (crow's feet), Dysport can deliver more desirable results. Once the Dysport is installed, your facial expressions can continue to look natural even with certain frozen facial muscles. However, patients with allergies to Dysport (or any botulinum toxin product), skin infections, neurological disorders, and pregnant or breastfeeding women should not receive toxin injections. Post-marketing reports indicate that the effects of Dysport and all botulinum toxin products can spread from the injection area to produce symptoms consistent with the effects of botulinum toxin. The best results from Dysport only come from experienced providers.
This is a drastic and more costly procedure to perform, especially when less invasive treatments, such as Dysport injections, are available. Ultimately, it's important to consult with a qualified medical professional before deciding which injectable is right for you.
